Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The Newseum in Washington, D.C.



Over the weekend, I finally got to the Newseum in Washington, D.C.

I am a little predispositioned to like it, as the title is a portmanteau, which is usually pretty amaziful.



What struck me the most was how much this building reminded me, not of journalism, but of journalists. Overall the structure was driven, determined, accessible, honest, pompous and flawed.

 

 The interior spaces were open, filled poetically with the blinding light of criticism and truth. The whole building sits gingerly and tidy on the edge of its seat, like a well-dressed wallflower begging to be asked by anyone.

 

What bothered me the most was that the floor plan and progression of spaces were overly complicated. You are confused on purpose and I suspect the intention was to force discomfort which then allows you to discover how to get along on your own. It’s possible that this was the architect’s intention, because that’s what reporters have to do when they follow a story.

 

That may be what journalists have to do, but it shouldn’t be what architects do. Museums are for the people, and as such you should make it as clear as possible for us to understand why we should know what’s going on. It may be my own bizarre bias, but I think confusion only works in religious space and homes. Being lost should be a personal experience, just like finding your way is always a measure of personal success.

 

Confusion, when pushed onto other people, is just rude and inconvenient.

 

The one area I did like was the +40’ First amendment etched in stone on the front. Often journalists are accused of hiding behind the first amendment, but that’s what its there for. And having it physically shielding the building not only allows it to pay homage to the other great architecture in DC


 

but it also shields this building from the terrible fate of being overly indulgent and boring.

 

Long Story Short: Stephen Colbert, may have been right: Newsoleum.

 

Also, Jo, we might have competition: community.livejournal.com/doorwindowwall/

Love Letters to Dead Architects: Mrs. Potter's Lullaby



Mi Caro, Antoni Gaudi,


Before you, what was there? I can’t even remember.


In my foggy memory there are visions of flat forms and half-hearted cold, stone, dead flowers. Buildings that seem like cracked china dolls in dresses of ancient and stained lace. Then out of no where, a Skeletal, Barcelnonian Dragon bursts through and consumes all things with the flames of passion, hyperboles of terror and arches carved from purest love. That dragon’s name: Catha Bathillo. No knight in shining armor is coming to stop this monster. It was the shining knight that set it free.

You set my world on fire, and filled me to the brim with your glory. 

Well what now then? You and I both know what is coming: You’re going to give yourself to that Church. La Sagrada Familia. I have been to the beginning and I will never need anything to make me see the infinite you create there, no concoction, no drug, no drink. In your perfectly imperfect hallucination there is only true beauty…this does not mean I will not have a drink, drug or concoction anyway.

So GO. Fight that clean industrial and unforgiving crispness, Go to your church, GO to God, and don’t forget to put in a good word for me. I will need it.

 

With Love,

Retly Corm




My Dearest William Le Baron Jenney,

 

I’ve missed you terribly. More than I thought I would as a matter of fact. Ever since you went away I can barely look outside without thinking of you and slowly but surely I realized how much you meant to me.

 

I know I pushed you away. I can’t tell you how many times I regretted yelling at you. I’m sorry for telling you that your desire for change was just an unpractical dream and that you chase these strange visions through moats, boats, jungles and cities only to find nothingness. I was wrong, but you didn’t need me to tell you that, you already know.

 

Will, do you remember that day in Paris when you gave us all such a great scare? You fell off the bridge and I went diving in after you, and when I pulled you to shore you were babbling about how stone was a pathetic structural choice, that you could do the same job at one third the weight with steel. You said we could be free, all of us. You said that stone just made us cling to our notions that we had to pay homage to the ghosts of dead empires we no longer feared. We all thought you had a concussion.

 

Then Gustave Eiffel brought you a flask of wine and you refused to drink it. He listened as you continued to ramble. I realize now what I should have realized then. That in those few moments of terror you had reached a clarity it would take me years to see.  

 

I know that it’s too late, for me, for us. I’m here. You’re in Chicago. You can’t possibly leave, what with that team of Lost Boys you call a firm, and my duty is here. But know that if I had to do it all over again, I still would have jumped into the Seine, but this time I would have listened to your nonsense.

 

With Love,

 

Retly Corm

 

 

Dear Margaret Macdonald,

 

I can’t take it anymore darling. Last time we sat there, our merry little party; your sister, Frances, her husband McNair, Charles, you and I, I realized I can’t keep this is a secret anymore. I know my timing is horrible and it doesn’t make any sense for me to feel this way; our lives are such that any sort of action on these emotions on my part would be foolhardy and inevitably lead to heartbreak.

 

 That being said, I didn’t want to lose the lottery jackpot just because I didn’t buy a ticket, so you see why I had to tell you how I feel… Your paintings are so beautiful; I fell in love with them, and with you. And not just the paintings, you are a true renaissance woman. Metalwork, ceramics, textile, all of them speak not only of the modern aspect but also speak of your deep investment in your Scottish heritage. You prove that a lack of formal decoration does not mean a lack of history and memory…

 

Come with me, you can escape the eclipse of your husband. He may be a good architect, but you are great everything.

 

Yours, ever,

 

Retly Corm


 

Dear Charles Rennie Mackintosh,

 

Fine. Be that way. But JUST SO YOU KNOW, Margaret was coming to tell me that she is staying with you.

 

You didn’t need to make that scene in the Willow Tea Room. We could have been adults, we could have talked. But what you did, honestly, it was just embarrassing. Just because you designed it, doesn’t mean you can smash that perfectly executed chair over my head.

 

I think your rage was just because you know deep in your heart that I see what you see. Margaret has real genius, you only have talent. Look at your work before you met Margaret and your work after her influence. It’s undeniable.

 

Admit it. Hill House never would have happened without her. The clean, angular lines are out of her sketchbook and transferred into three dimensional spaces by your hand. Your work is impressive Chuck, maybe even timeless, but that is no excuse for your behavior towards me.

 

By the time you read this, I will have left with Giles Gilbert Scott. If you want to fight me, find me in London. I’ll be the one in Red Glass box.

 

-Retly Corm

 

Salve Marcus Vitruvius Pollio,


It is no longer possible for me to live with you, yet I cannot live without you either. Is it secure to feel this way? In short, tortured by you, am I.

Firmitas, Utilitas, Venustas. You are my strength, my utility and my delight. I have never found a man who is more the balance of all three like you. Often, both in men and in buildings, there is clarity and strength but no joy. With others, their charm is unmistakable but so it their frivolity.

Now I know that you, yourself have never created a structure to match your dogma perfectly, clearly this is intentional on your part. For as your patron’s sire once said “Creating is better than learning. Creating is the essence of life.” Following rules to the letter is irrelevant as long as beauty in the end creation is your desire.    

Sometime now I’ve have feared your wary eye,

The logic and order of these things gone by,

Having seen you at lupercalia, that great festival,

So now there is nothing for me but to fall.


Eternally yours,

-Retly Corm



Friday, December 25, 2009

Fallingwater, with Falling Snow

 I shall finally post my comments and experience of my overdue first trip to Fallingwater.

To paint the scene, I am stationed in Maryland, a vacation house that sleeps 16, with my assorted maternal kin - there are about 14 of us.  8 folks signed up for the tour and were totally psyched about going, but only 6 of us ended up going... why, you ask?  Umm... snow.  It snowed like 5 inches in the 4 hours before we were destined to make our trip!  Nevertheless, those of us who fearlessly braved the slush had a frickin' blast!

I guess I didn't realize how huge the place was, in terms of square footage, with all the separate rooms.  The more private areas are definitely smaller feeling with the lower ceilings, but that's the idea - more intimacy...  I'm pretty much a big fan of every part of this house, save the hallways.  According to our guide, Frank L'Wright didn't believe people should linger in hallways - they are merely a vessel for getting from Room A to Room B.  I'm not sure I agree with that, but I reckon the shoe fits at Fallingwater.

I have to say, some of the highlights were the windows that opened up over the waterfall - I can see myself working in the room and opening the window to drown out the bustling brash of my cohabitants (I despise loud noises from other occupants).  I can also imagine myself falling asleep to the churning of the waterfall, despite it being loud.  I also loved that every room had a slender 5' foot or so high window in them.  And that they were operable - gotta love operable windows, fo' sho'.  I kind of like the idea of having a "sleeping room" and a "dressing room."  It would be nice to just have a totally isolated and specifically designated sleep space, to which you can retreat at the end of the day, knowing that you haven't junked it up during the course the day.

The only problem with our visit, was that it was probably 30º outside with freezing rain.  So I was just absolutely frigid and could not muster the strength to partake in the walk around the surrounding paths, or I believe it was called the "Nature Walk?"

Another bummer with the adventure was that we were unable to take photographs inside.  I wonder if we had purchased the extended tour would we be allowed to - they made it seem like such was the case on the website?

Anyway, I definitely think Fallingwater is a spectacular building, and you probably won't appreciate it as much until you visit it.  It's pretty remarkable the condition that it is in, particularly after the millions (or was it just over 1 million?) of visitors who have trekked through its rooms, ascended its stairs, and peered through its windows.  Oh, the balconies galore were pretty sick too.  I'm not sure I buy the idea of continuing the line of the furniture out onto the parapet - afterall that makes for a very precariously undersized guardrail - it looked like 18 inches!

Unfortunately I am a bit distracted by the assorted holiday activities abuzz around me, so this post may be a bit stream of consciousness and disjointed.  However, I am trying to get back into the swang of thangs!

I plan to do some biographical reading on some architecture/design-related folks, and make some posts on here about it.  Also there are probably some comments I can make since I am working in the field now.  Maybe I should do some sort of "fictional" story or plot line that develops as I have encounters in the workforce.

Anyway, I am sure I will find the occasion to make more compelling comments about Fallingwater in the future - for now, let this suffice!

Monday, November 9, 2009

Over the River and Through the Woods, to Louis Kahn's House We Go!

It was something like October 10th.  The Corm and I were desperate for architectural exploration, and a little fresh air.  We deduced an itinerary for the Chestnut Hill/Elkins Park/Germantown Ave area.  And then the journey began!

Although we were unable to secure entry to ANY of the architectural wonders we encountered that day, we did get up close and personal with them.  And I think that is much better than just reading about them or seeing someone else's photos.  Here are some thoughts about the various works we visited:

Baltimore Ohio Railroad Depot
Frank Furness
Flipping sweet.  This was built in 1886?  Get out.  I'm sure if we had made it inside we'd notice more signs of its age, but from the outside it looked pretty intact!  That's not to say the local Chestnut Hillians didn't sponsor some restoration, because that is so them, but it looks excellent.  The detailing was most pleasurable, the Cormster grabbed many a snapshot of the various intricacies of the project.  Why couldn't the East Falls train station be like this?

Venturi House
Robert Venturi (Bob)
I always pictured this building as light brown or tan, definitely not blue.  Maybe I've only seen older photos of it.  Anyway, it is definitely a unique one.  There is so much going on which you can really only get a sense of by creeping over the backyard fence.  With all the awkwardness on the exterior, I have a great curiosity about what sorts of architectural jests Bobby made on the interior.  The assortment of clerestory windows and interlocking masses gets me pretty excited.  I wonder how many 40, 50, 60-year old trick-or-treaters they got on Halloween... maybe we should have postponed our adventure 2 weeks for the perfect alibi to get a glimpse inside the houses!!!

Esherick House
Louis Kahn
Secluded on an elusive drive, the Esherick House presents a mysterious facade.  The graphic nature of the exterior's contrasting wood and concrete finishes makes it delightfully novel.  With a big-ass window and an ittby bitty balcony, I can picture some exquisite invite-only parties here.  I'm not sure if I agree with its current landscaping...

Beth Sholom Synagogue
Frank Lloyd Wright
I've been to this beast before, with my architectural history class, so although we were turned away on account of the Sabbath, I do have some recollection of the interior.  The strongest memory I have of the place is the 5 or so trash cans that were strategically placed throughout the seats and aisles to capture the rainwater trickling through the aging translucent panels.  I don't know how soon the roof began to leak after construction, but I do recall that it is too expensive to replace and that the panels were originally not yellow.  I think this was one of the earliest applications of these kind of panel system, so a more recent installation would prove less penetrable.  They always say Frank was ahead of his time.  Again with the detailing, this place is laden.  I haven't been to many synagogues, but I suspect this one (on a clear day) offers is congregation a very spiritual escape.  I remember that the sections and rows of seating were angled and sloped in such a way to give vast views of the central space.  You could make eye contact with other members of the congregation during the ceremony, without turning your head.  I thought this was pretty cool.  It is quite a deviation from my experience as a Catholic parishioner sitting in straight rows, facing forward.

to be continued...

Sunday, October 25, 2009

The Architect in Fiction: Battle for the Ultimate TV Architect.



Normal
0


false
false
false







MicrosoftInternetExplorer4








/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

 

 

Ted Mosby Vs. Mike Brady Vs. Marshall Darling


Let's look, first, as to why they’re similar:

 

They are all men and TV Dads who are all the ultimate authority when you’ve accidentally stolen something, or have hit your sister with a football, breaking her nose and ruining her chances for romance at the dance (or did it?). While they all proudly state they are architects, we rarely see them working. A little odd, since architects LOVE to work and rarely do anything else. When we do see them working, the work is beautifully crafted or impeccably drawn and pretty much finished. In my limited experience, that is pretty much impossible on a first go.

 

Ok so that is how they are similar. How are the Different?

 

Contestant Number One: Ted Mosby How I Met Your Mother


 

            How do you make holidays special?

·        I watch my friends slap each other

 

            What do you look for in a woman?

·        I always ask is she the kind of woman who I could marry and discuss constantly but never meet until my show is no longer profitable?

 

            Where do you see yourself 10 years from now?

·        Oh My God I want to be married.

 

Ted Mosby is a funny dude, and out of all three of these men, most blatantly carries on the quirks common amongst architects. Ted is equal parts neurotic, egomaniacal, earnest and sneaky. He will a become a Mike Brady but he is still in the early stages, making mistakes and finding his Carol. Ted is more ready to geek-out then his rivals, I think my favorite moment being when he goes on and on about the 5 architects he would like to have dinner with, I realized I had done that myself, many a time.

 

Contestant Number Two: Mike Brady The Brady Bunch



You need to cancel your weekend plans because of rain, what do you do instead?

·        Might I recommend a house of cards to settle a family dispute?

What color best describes your personality and why?

·        Either Burnt-Sienna or a Chocolate Brown. Neutral, safe and probably smells like meat-loaf.

Your work let's you out early, what do you do with this free time?

·        Potato Sack Race, Bitches.
 

Mike Brady, The most stereotypical TV Dad available just happens to be an Architect. He does that thing where he pauses before speaking, as if what he is about to say is the smartest thing you have ever heard, even if it doesn’t make any sense. Throwing Latin around all willy-nilly and yet we still believe him. Unlike the other two, Mr. Brady is a vague architect, never really showing any interest in his work, which is understandable, because, well, he has 6 kids.
 

Contestant Number Three: Marshall Darling Clarissa Explains It All




Your house is on fire, what do you grab as you run out?

·        Besides my children? My awards.

If you had a million dollars, what would you do with it?

·        I would design more buildings that look like things.

What do you wish you could change, if you could change one thing?

·        I wish my Mies-esque mentor would remember my name.
 

Marshall Darling is a mix of Mike and Ted. He has the vague wisdom of a Brady, but the endearing quirks of a Mosby. Unlike the other two, we get a clear window into the kind of Architecture Mr. Darling works on. He designs buildings that look like things, making him an inexplicable post-modernist. Unlike Mike Brady, Darling embarrasses his children with his excitement rather than his general lameness.

 

So who wins the TV Architect-off?
 

Personally, I think Ted Mosby wins this one, even though not technically a “TV Architect Dad”, (He is a father in the show, but we never see him actually interacting with his children, as they are in the future after the story-line is concluded.) He is the best portrayed TV Architect.
 

So why Ted?
 

Because he is the narrator and protagonist, we get the most feel for him out of the three so unlike Darling and Brady, Ted is not a satellite character who is in constant but distant control. Ted tells you he is facing hardships with a rival, or that he had to turn to academics when his attempted one-man firm failed. That insecurity, timed with the Older Mosby’s witty interjections, work to create a fuller kind of depiction of an architect. Ted Mosby proves that architects aren’t born old or wise, but many become that way just because they keep finding new ways of messing up their lives and live to embarrass themselves further.

But that’s just my opinion: you be the judge, do you pick:

  1. Immature yet Sincere, Ted Mosby
  2. Boring yet Wise, Mike Brady
  3. Geeky yet Handy, Marshall Darling

 

Friday, October 9, 2009

Escapism

So here is what I've decided to do: every so often I decide to get away, while sitting on my couch. So I design imaginary hide-outs. I'll post them all when I get to 50, 50 is a good number of hide-outs to have. Keep watch.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Magical History Tour

I forgot to put this up last summer... enjoy!